Re: Questions about btree_gin vs btree_gist for low cardinalitycolumns
От | Gavin Flower |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Questions about btree_gin vs btree_gist for low cardinalitycolumns |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 45a5915b-870b-1dea-ca1d-395b067940ad@archidevsys.co.nz обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Questions about btree_gin vs btree_gist for low cardinality columns (Morris de Oryx <morrisdeoryx@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Questions about btree_gin vs btree_gist for low cardinality columns
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On 01/06/2019 14:52, Morris de Oryx wrote: [...] > For an example, imagine an address table with 100M US street addresses > with two character state abbreviations. So, say there are around 60 > values in there (the USPS is the mail system for a variety of US > territories, possessions and friends in the Pacific.) Okay, so what's > the best index type for state abbreviation? For the sake of argument, > assume a normal distribution so something like FM (Federated States of > Micronesia) is on a tail end and CA or NY are a whole lot more common. [...] I'd expect the distribution of values to be closer to a power law than the Normal distribution -- at very least a few states would have the most lookups. But this is my gut feel, not based on any scientific analysis! Cheers, Gavin
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: