Re: pgsql: Bumping catversion due to changes to pg_trigger and pg_rewrite.
От | Jan Wieck |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pgsql: Bumping catversion due to changes to pg_trigger and pg_rewrite. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 45FF5E22.2010906@Yahoo.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pgsql: Bumping catversion due to changes to pg_trigger and pg_rewrite. (Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: pgsql: Bumping catversion due to changes to pg_trigger
and pg_rewrite.
|
Список | pgsql-committers |
On 3/20/2007 12:00 AM, Neil Conway wrote: > Jan Wieck wrote: >> BTW, the comment in this file says that we hope we never have more than >> 10 catversion changes per day, but to even make this possible we should >> start counting at zero, shouldn't we? >> > > The comment says "hopefully we'll never commit ten independent sets of > catalog changes on the same day" (not > 10), so the comment isn't wrong. > But I guess there wouldn't be any harm at starting at zero... Since the entire catversion number is used as an integer, counting 0...9 vs. 1...0 makes quite a difference. And that difference manifests itself >9, not >10. Jan -- #======================================================================# # It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. # # Let's break this rule - forgive me. # #================================================== JanWieck@Yahoo.com #
В списке pgsql-committers по дате отправления: