Re: pg_dumpall and version confusion
От | Tony Caduto |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_dumpall and version confusion |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 45FAB715.9060402@amsoftwaredesign.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_dumpall and version confusion ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: pg_dumpall and version confusion
|
Список | pgsql-general |
Joshua D. Drake wrote: > other deficiencies let's not add to complexity by having an > --output-version. > > If you want that, create a wrapper program that calls to different > statically compiled versions of pg_dump. > > Joshua D. Drake > > > > I am afraid that I have to agree with Tom here. Pg_dump has plenty of Well for me that would not be a option. I use object pascal and can't statically link C code into my apps. Doing the statically linked thing would also bloat any resulting binary. I don't think the whole --output-version thing would be a good idea either, but it would be a simple matter to add some logic for the GRANT ON SEQUENCE, which seems to be the only thing that is really causing problems at least between 8.1 and 8.2. The old way of granting permissions on sequences still works on 8.2 right? If so then maybe a switch to disable GRANT ON SEQUENCE would do the trick. Later, -- Tony Caduto AM Software Design http://www.amsoftwaredesign.com Home of PG Lightning Admin for Postgresql Your best bet for Postgresql Administration
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: