Re: dfmgr additional ABI version fields
От | Andres Freund |
---|---|
Тема | Re: dfmgr additional ABI version fields |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 45ED8985-0756-4FE3-B651-0EC431CF1445@anarazel.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: dfmgr additional ABI version fields (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: dfmgr additional ABI version fields
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hi, On October 7, 2021 8:49:57 AM PDT, Tom Lane >I'm also kind of unclear on why we need to do anything about this >in the community version. If someone has forked PG and changed >APIs to the extent that extensions are unlikely to work, there's >not much stopping them from also making the two-line change >to fmgr.h that would be needed to guarantee that different magic >struct contents are needed. I can see two reasons. First, it'd probably allow stock pg to generate a better error message when confronted with such amodule. Second, there's some value in signaling forks that they should change (or think about changing), that field. Andres -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: