Re: Acclerating INSERT/UPDATE using UPS
От | Joshua D. Drake |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Acclerating INSERT/UPDATE using UPS |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 45E0DAD4.9090106@commandprompt.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Acclerating INSERT/UPDATE using UPS (Christopher Browne <cbbrowne@acm.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: Acclerating INSERT/UPDATE using UPS
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Christopher Browne wrote: > A long time ago, in a galaxy far, far away, kawasima@cs.tsukuba.ac.jp (Hideyuki Kawashima) wrote: >> I appreciate your great suggestion! >> It is great honor for me if Sigres will be merged to PostgreSQL. >> Since the changes of Sigres from PostgreSQL-8.2.1 are not many, >> and moreover, all of changes are surrounded with #ifdef SIGRES --- #endif, >> incorporating Sigres into PostgreSQL would be easy. > > You should consider submitting a patch for this against CVS HEAD. > > And actually, I'd think it a better idea to define a GUC variable and > use that to control whether Sigres is active or not. > > At the more sophisticated end of the spectrum, you might set things up > so that it could be activated/deactivated at runtime by a superuser. > > At the less sophisticated end, it might need to be configured in > postgresql.conf... Whatever happen with this? Joshua D. Drake -- === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. === Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240 Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997 http://www.commandprompt.com/ Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: