Re: SCMS question
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: SCMS question |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 45E0B857.2070003@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: SCMS question (Warren Turkal <wt@penguintechs.org>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Warren Turkal wrote: > On Saturday 24 February 2007 00:55, Magnus Hagander wrote: > >> AFAIK, git still does not support windows properly[1], which I would say >> is a killer... Unless you can of course to everything you need through >> one of those frontend protocols, but if you can do everything that way >> then why would you need git in the first place? >> > > You might be able to get the cvs functionality. That's not necessarily > everything you could have, but it means that you can operate without losing > functionality for some developers while increasing functionality for a number > of developers. I think would be a pretty good thing. > > I would not be at all happy with making such a compromise. Proper support for all the platforms we build on is an absolute prequisite, as far as I am concerned. I'm not prepared to treat Windows as a second-class citizen. I also think that if we change to another SCM it should be something in widespread use in FOSS systems - ideally also something supported already in many distributions. As I said earlier, there is no hurry. cheers andrew
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: