Re: SCMS question
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: SCMS question |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 45DF1C98.9000305@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: SCMS question ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: SCMS question
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Joshua D. Drake wrote: >> Moreover work on things like bitmapped indexes that other people want to help >> on is hampered by this need to be mailing around patches. If two or three >> people submit changes (based possibly on different old versions of the patch) >> the main developer has to merge them into his version of the patch by hand and >> mail out a new patch. The whole point of a revision control system is to >> provide tools to make that easier. >> > > O.k. everyone pay attention, I am about to agree with Greg! ;) > > Greg are their tools to migrate CVS to monotone or whatever your > favorite is? The reason I ask is that I migrate the CVS to SVN every 4 > hours I think it is and it isn't perfect. > Are you going to do trials for just Monotone, or will you include alternatives like, say, Mercurial (which seems to have quite a bit of traction, and should appeal to you as it's written in Python)? There is a generic conversion tool called Tailor that might help you: http://www.darcs.net/DarcsWiki/Tailor cheers andrew
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: