Re: php professional
От | Mark Walker |
---|---|
Тема | Re: php professional |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 45DDF8C7.9070307@omnicode.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: php professional (Scott Marlowe <smarlowe@g2switchworks.com>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
You're probably right. A good example of that is the difference between the excellent pgadmin and the desktop mysql administrator which is very buggy and strangely laid out. Whenever I have to deal with mysql I get the feeling I'm messing around with a bunch of hacks. It's very strange to deal with. Simple things like just granting access to a database you have to issue perhaps 3 different commands some from the os command line, some from the db interperter. I think people who understand the importance of administrative simplicity probably also make good coders and vice versa. Scott Marlowe wrote: > I wasn't referring to projects written in both languages. I was > referring to projects written primarily for MySQL or "real" databases > (i.e. oracle, pgsql, mssql, db2, and on and on). No matter what > language is used, I think you'll find that apps written primarily for > mysql have poorer code than the ones written primarily for other apps. > The ones that are truly transportable will generally be the best, but if > they try to support MySQL AND the other real databases, you'll likely > find lots of hacks in the code to keep MySQL happy, that wouldn't be > needed if they didn't support it. > > Does that make more sense? > >
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: