Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: SCMS question
От | Markus Schiltknecht |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: SCMS question |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 45DDC702.4060205@bluegap.ch обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: SCMS question (Markus Schiltknecht <markus@bluegap.ch>) |
Ответы |
Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: SCMS question
Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: SCMS question Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: SCMS question |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hello Richard, you should probably have read the thread on the PostgreSQL -hackers mailing list I've linked to... at least you didn't make Tom's point ;-) Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote: > 1. Do you want to stay with CVS or do you want to move to something > else? Most PostgreSQL developers currently want to stay with CVS. Only some desperate souls including myself are fiddling with other VCSes. > 3. What would you want a replacement to be able to do? That's being debated, with many voices saying: CVS (plus our own hackery) provides all we need. (And be warned again: as soon as you point out an advantage of your favourite VCS, you're making Tom's point. ;-) ) > So far, I'm getting the sense that there are a lot of opinions on what > replacement system to use, a bit carelessly before having answered the > above questions thoroughly. How did you get that impression? I'm currently *using* monotone for Postgres-R development, doing cvs_import and propagating to my branch. And I know others did the same already, too. Regards Markus
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: