Re: php professional
От | Tino Wildenhain |
---|---|
Тема | Re: php professional |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 45DDBE2F.4080201@wildenhain.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: postgresql vs mysql (Tim Tassonis <timtas@cubic.ch>) |
Ответы |
Re: php professional
|
Список | pgsql-general |
totally off topic, Tim Tassonis schrieb: > Ron Johnson wrote: >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> My definition is, "toy used/trumpeted by pseudo-professionals as a >> professional tool, when it just doesn't measure up". > > Boah, here surely speaks a true professional playing in the league of > Donald Knuth or even Alan Kay, as opposed to all the pseudos like me out > there. > > Is it Assembler or Smalltalk you write your web pages with? No, python, java ;) > PHP absolutely is a professional tool as a scripting language, of course > with all the downsides of any scripting language. I'll choose php over Well no. PHP is not a professional language because it has no really design - and that has nothing to do with the fact it beeing a scripting language. Its a bad scripting language. (Say namespaces for example, confusing function interfaces, unicode flaws, missing usable frameworks, silly type handling, quoting hell) > Perl any day, as it is syntactically much cleaner and performs > sufficiently well for usual scripting needs. ah... yes. Dont like perl either but its at least carrying some actual language design. > Of course, I wouldn't write an operating system with it. Would you write a language with it? :-) Btw, "professional programmers" can indeed use funny languages - they are professional by they earning their living with it. T.
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: