Re: Auto-Vacuum in 8.1 was ineffective for me. 8.2 may work better?
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления:
| От | Matthew T. O'Connor |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Auto-Vacuum in 8.1 was ineffective for me. 8.2 may work better? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 45DCAD50.8080104@zeut.net обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Auto-Vacuum in 8.1 was ineffective for me. 8.2 may work better? (Mark Stosberg <mark@summersault.com>) |
| Ответы |
Using the 8.2 autovacuum values with 8.1
|
| Список | pgsql-performance |
Mark Stosberg wrote: > Let me ask the question a different way: Is simply setting the two > values plus enabling autovacuuming generally enough, or is further > tweaking common place? No, most people in addition to setting those two GUC settings also lower the threshold values (there is a fair amount of discussion on this in the lists) the defaults are not aggressive enough, so you tables probably aren't getting vacuumed often enough to keep up with the load. Some work loads also require that you do cron based vacuuming of specific highly active tables. > Perhaps I'll give it another tree when we upgrade to 8.2. Autovacuum is still somewhat new, and there were some significant improvements in 8.2 so yes you should give it another try.
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления:
Сайт использует файлы cookie для корректной работы и повышения удобства. Нажимая кнопку «Принять» или продолжая пользоваться сайтом, вы соглашаетесь на их использование в соответствии с Политикой в отношении обработки cookie ООО «ППГ», в том числе на передачу данных из файлов cookie сторонним статистическим и рекламным службам. Вы можете управлять настройками cookie через параметры вашего браузера