Re: TopPlan, again

Gavin Sherry wrote:
> On Sun, 18 Feb 2007, Tom Lane wrote:
> 

>> Comments, objections?  Also, any thoughts about the names to use for
>> these new node types?  As I commented last year, I'm not completely
>> happy with "TopPlan" because it won't actually be a subtype of Plan,
>> but I don't have a better idea.  Also I'm unsure what to call the
>> cut-down RangeTblEntry struct; maybe RunTimeRangeTblEntry?
> 
> I think TopPlan is misleading. What about MetaPlan instead of TopPlan? I
> think RunTimeRangeTblEntry is okay, though long. ExecRangeTblEntry?
> 

Would ExecPlan be better? - matches ExecRangeTblEntry.

Cheers

Mark