Re: [GENERAL] ISO week dates
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [GENERAL] ISO week dates |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 45D5BA44.3010002@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [GENERAL] ISO week dates (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [GENERAL] ISO week dates
|
Список | pgsql-patches |
Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Bruce Momjian escribió: > >> Followup --- something weird is going on. I am seeing _random_ failures >> of the regression tests here in that same place, and the build farm >> seems to fail in the same place, but with different row counts. >> > > This failure is pretty interesting: > > --- 724,730 ---- > date_part( 'isoyear', d1) AS isoyear, date_part( 'week', d1) AS week, > date_part( 'dow', d1) AS dow > FROM TIMESTAMP_TBL WHERE d1 BETWEEN '1902-01-01' AND '2038-01-01'; > ! ERROR: relation "timestamp_tbl" does not exist > -- TO_CHAR() > SELECT '' AS to_char_1, to_char(d1, 'DAY Day day DY Dy dy MONTH Month month RM MON Mon mon') > FROM TIMESTAMPTZ_TBL; > > http://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=agouti&dt=2007-02-16%2005:15:01 > > How can the table fail to exist, and yet not report a problem when it > was created? > > Looks to me like the timestamptz test relies on the timestamp test (for timestamp_tbl) but they are set to run in parallel, so we have a race condition. Oops! cheers andrew
В списке pgsql-patches по дате отправления: