Re: Missing directory when building 8.2.3-base
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Missing directory when building 8.2.3-base |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 45D200EB.5050501@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Missing directory when building 8.2.3-base ("Andrew Hammond" <andrew.george.hammond@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Missing directory when building 8.2.3-base
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Andrew Hammond wrote: > On Feb 12, 5:16 pm, j...@commandprompt.com ("Joshua D. Drake") wrote: > >> Peter Eisentraut wrote: >> >>> Jeroen T. Vermeulen wrote: >>> >>>> Is this a known problem? Is there any test procedure that builds the >>>> "base" distribution before release? >>>> >>> Most of the core team is convinced that the postgresql-foo tarballs are >>> useless, but Marc insists on keeping them. But since they are nearly >>> useless, no one tests them, so it is not surprising that they don't >>> work. >>> >> Why do we keep them again? I can't recall at any point in the life of >> CMD us ever using the -foo tarballs. Not to mention they just take up space. >> >> Let's dump them. >> > > The FreeBSD database/postgres* ports depend on them. Which is probably > why Marc insists on keeping them. > > Well, I think that's a horrid dependency to have. Other packaging systems (e.g. the RPM builds) seem quite able to split up a single unified build into multiple packages - what can't FBSD? What would we do if some other packaging system wanted to ask us for a different split? cheers andrew
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: