Re: stack usage in toast_insert_or_update()

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Jan Wieck
Тема Re: stack usage in toast_insert_or_update()
Дата
Msg-id 45C21AA2.1060309@Yahoo.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: stack usage in toast_insert_or_update()  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: stack usage in toast_insert_or_update()  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 1/31/2007 12:41 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Pavan Deolasee" <pavan.deolasee@gmail.com> writes:
>> On 1/31/07, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>>> The toast code takes pains to ensure that the tuples it creates won't be
>>> subject to re-toasting.  Else it'd be an infinite recursion.
> 
>> I think I found it. The toast_insert_or_update() function gets into an
>> unnecessary recursion because of alignment issues. It thus toasts
>> already toasted data.  This IMHO might be causing unnecessary
>> overheads for each toast operation.
> 
> Interesting --- I'd never seen this because both of my usual development
> machines have MAXALIGN 8, and it works out that that makes
> TOAST_MAX_CHUNK_SIZE 1986, which makes the actual toasted tuple size
> 2030, which maxaligns to 2032, which is still less than
> TOAST_TUPLE_THRESHOLD.  I think the coding was implicitly assuming that
> TOAST_TUPLE_THRESHOLD would itself be a maxalign'd value, but it's not
> necessarily (and in fact not, with the current page header size ---
> I wonder whether the bug was originally masked because the page header
> size was different??)
> 
> We can't change TOAST_MAX_CHUNK_SIZE without forcing an initdb, but I
> think that it would be safe to remove the MAXALIGN'ing of the tuple
> size in the tests in heapam.c, that is
> 
>     if (HeapTupleHasExternal(tup) ||
>         (MAXALIGN(tup->t_len) > TOAST_TUPLE_THRESHOLD))
>         heaptup = toast_insert_or_update(relation, tup, NULL);
>     else
>         heaptup = tup;
> 
> becomes
> 
>     if (HeapTupleHasExternal(tup) ||
>         (tup->t_len > TOAST_TUPLE_THRESHOLD))
>         heaptup = toast_insert_or_update(relation, tup, NULL);
>     else
>         heaptup = tup;
> 
> which'll save a cycle or two as well as avoid this corner case.
> It seems like a number of the uses of MAXALIGN in tuptoaster.c
> are useless/bogus as well.  Comments?

Can't we maxalign the page header in the calculations?


Jan

> 
>             regards, tom lane
> 
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
> 
>                http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq


-- 
#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me.                                  #
#================================================== JanWieck@Yahoo.com #


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Hans-Juergen Schoenig
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: max_locks_per_transactions ...
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Estimation error in n_dead_tuples