Re: Predicted lifespan of different PostgreSQL branches
От | Joshua D. Drake |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Predicted lifespan of different PostgreSQL branches |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 45BB8152.70107@commandprompt.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Predicted lifespan of different PostgreSQL branches (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
> Anyway I think that a fair case could be made for dropping the 8.0 > branch now, and maybe 8.1 too, as far as Windows support goes. What > you want to do going forward is a different decision --- these are > edge cases because of the newness of the port. Well as someone who has literally thousands of windows installations (thank goodness we are not front line support for that). It would be very helpful if the community did make a confirmed and public statement about the lifespan of the Windows ports. It would enable me to get certain customers to upgrade and stop wasting energy on hunting bugs on unsupported or unlikely to be supported releases. Sincerely, Joshua D. Drake > > regards, tom lane > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate > subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your > message can get through to the mailing list cleanly > -- === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. === Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240 Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997 http://www.commandprompt.com/ Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: