Re: tsearch in core patch, for inclusion
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: tsearch in core patch, for inclusion |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 45B7AB42.6070803@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: tsearch in core patch, for inclusion ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: tsearch in core patch, for inclusion
Re: tsearch in core patch, for inclusion Re: tsearch in core patch, for inclusion Re: tsearch in core patch, for inclusion |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Joshua D. Drake wrote: > Peter Eisentraut wrote: > >> Teodor Sigaev wrote: >> >>> If there aren't objections then we plan commit patch tomorrow or >>> after tomorrow. >>> >> I still haven't heard any argument for why this would be necessary or >> desirable at all, other than that it looks better for marketing >> reasons, which I will counter by saying that it looks worse for >> marketing reasons because our hailed plugin mechanism is apparently so >> poor that it can't support some practical extension module such as >> this. >> > > Of which I will counter that we don't have a hailed plugin mechanism. We > have a contrib which professionals generally consider untested and not > part of PostgreSQL. > > I am constantly running into this: > > Q. Does PostgreSQL have full text indexing? > A. Yes it is in contrib. > Q. But that isn't part of core. > A. *sigh* > > Where on the website can I see what "plugins" are included with PostgreSQL? > > Where on the website can I see the Official PostgreSQL Documentation for > Full Text Indexing? > > With TSearch2 in core will that fix the many upgrade problems associated > with using TSearch2? > > > contrib is a horrible misnomer. Can we maybe bite the bullet and call it something else? cheers andrew
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: