Re: Piggybacking vacuum I/O

Pavan Deolasee wrote:
> Another source of I/O is perhaps the CLOG read/writes for checking
> transaction status. If we are talking about large tables like accounts in
> pgbench or customer/stock in DBT2, the tables are vacuumed much later than
> the actual UPDATEs. I don't have any numbers to prove yet, but my sense is
> that CLOG pages holding the status of many of the transactions might have
> been already flushed out of the cache and require an I/O. Since the default
> CLOG SLRU buffers is set to 8, there could be severe CLOG SLRU thrashing
> during VACUUM as the transaction ids will be all random in a heap page.

8 log pages hold 8*8192*4=262144 transactions. If the active set of 
transactions is larger than that, the OS cache will probably hold more 
clog pages. I guess you could end up doing some I/O on clog on a vacuum 
of a big table, if you have a high transaction rate and vacuum 
infrequently...

> Would it help to set the status of the XMIN/XMAX of tuples early enough 
> such
> that the heap page is still in the buffer cache, but late enough such that
> the XMIN/XMAX transactions are finished ? How about doing it when the
> bgwriter is about to write the page to disk ? Assuming few seconds of life
> of a heap page in the buffer cache, hopefully most of the XMIN/XMAX
> transactions should have completed and bgwriter can set 
> XMIN(XMAX)_COMMITTED
> or XMIN(XMAX)_INVALID for most of the tuples in the page. This would 
> save us
> CLOG I/Os  later, either during subsequent access to the tuple and/or
> vacuum.

Yeah, we could do that. First I'd like to see some more evidence that 
clog trashing is a problem, though.

--   Heikki Linnakangas  EnterpriseDB   http://www.enterprisedb.com