Re: Patch for text.css
От | Magnus Hagander |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Patch for text.css |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 45B29BC7.3030606@hagander.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Patch for text.css (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Patch for text.css
|
Список | pgsql-www |
I was hoping someone else would comment on which one of the two they preferred before we committed it. And then I promptly forgot about it ;-) So, which one do people prefer? //Magnus Bruce Momjian wrote: > Are we going to apply this? > > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Magnus Hagander wrote: >> Robert Treat wrote: >>> On Monday 08 January 2007 11:20, Magnus Hagander wrote: >>>> On Sun, Jan 07, 2007 at 08:53:30PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: >>>>> Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes: >>>>>> Or should we perhaps just stop setting a color at all on it? That would >>>>>> let the browser choose color? >>>>> I wouldn't vote for that; the odds are good that the browser's defaults >>>>> would look ugly, or maybe even be nearly invisible against our >>>>> backgrounds. We *should* set the link colors ... just not to the same >>>>> thing. >>>> I've applied the patch to http://magnus-master.pgadmin.org with the >>>> color as suggested, for review. >>>> >>>> Thoughts? Different color? Suggestions? >>>> >>> I had a hard time differentiating it last night, so I changed it to use the >>> standard color on http://xzilla.postgresql.org just to get a different look. >>> Anyone interested in comparing can check it out. >> I personally think yours is clearer, but I'm a bit concerned on the >> third opinion ;-) Anybody else care to chime in? >> >> //Magnus >> >> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- >> TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to >> choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not >> match >
В списке pgsql-www по дате отправления: