Postgres and really huge tables
От | Brian Hurt |
---|---|
Тема | Postgres and really huge tables |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 45AFD927.9050605@janestcapital.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: RES: Priority to a mission critical transaction (Ron Mayer <rm_pg@cheapcomplexdevices.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Postgres and really huge tables
Re: Postgres and really huge tables Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Postgres and really huge tables Re: Postgres and really huge tables Re: Postgres and really huge tables Re: Postgres and really huge tables |
Список | pgsql-performance |
Is there any experience with Postgresql and really huge tables? I'm talking about terabytes (plural) here in a single table. Obviously the table will be partitioned, and probably spread among several different file systems. Any other tricks I should know about? We have a problem of that form here. When I asked why postgres wasn't being used, the opinion that postgres would "just <explicitive> die" was given. Personally, I'd bet money postgres could handle the problem (and better than the ad-hoc solution we're currently using). But I'd like a couple of replies of the form "yeah, we do that here- no problem" to wave around. Brian
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: