Re: Autoanalyze settings with zero scale factor
От | Matthew T. O'Connor |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Autoanalyze settings with zero scale factor |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 45AFC86B.9010704@zeut.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Autoanalyze settings with zero scale factor ("Jeremy Haile" <jhaile@fastmail.fm>) |
Ответы |
Re: Autoanalyze settings with zero scale factor
|
Список | pgsql-performance |
Jeremy Haile wrote: > I changed the table-specific settings so that the ANALYZE base threshold > was 5000 and the ANALYZE scale factor is 0. According to the documented > formula: analyze threshold = analyze base threshold + analyze scale > factor * number of tuples, I assumed that this would cause the table to > be analyzed everytime 5000 tuples were inserted/updated/deleted. That is right, and exactly how the scaling factor / base value are supposed to work, so this should be fine. > However, the tables have been updated with tens of thousands of inserts > and the table has still not been analyzed (according to > pg_stat_user_tables). Does a scale factor of 0 cause the table to never > be analyzed? What am I doing wrong? I'm using PG 8.2.1. No a scaling factor of 0 shouldn't stop the table from being analyzed. Unless it's just a bug, my only guess is that autovacuum may be getting busy at times (vacuuming large tables for example) and hasn't had a chance to even look at that table for a while, and by the time it gets to it, there have been tens of thousands of inserts. Does that sounds plausible? Also, are other auto-vacuums and auto-analyzes showing up in the pg_stats table? Maybe it's a stats system issue.
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: