Re: What is the motivation of include directive and
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: What is the motivation of include directive and |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 45AE2F6C.9040004@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: What is the motivation of include directive and (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote: > "Takayuki Tsunakawa" <tsunakawa.takay@jp.fujitsu.com> writes: > >> Still, I don't understand well why config files need to be placed >> outside the data directory, except for daring conform to FHS. >> > > The killer argument for it is that most of what is in $PGDATA should be > excluded from your normal filesystem backup method, because you need to > be using some database-aware mechanism for backing up the database. But > the config files are perfectly suited for standard filesystem backup, > and indeed will *not* be covered by, say, pg_dumpall. So putting them > somewhere else helps in creating a coherent backup strategy. > > My backup setup excludes subdirectories of the data dir, rather than the data dir itself. Meeting FHS requirements is no bad thing, though. And the ability to include a common configuration set in multiple instances is surely useful to a number of people. After all, you aren't forced to use these facilities - I typically don't. cheers andrew
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: