Re: Postgres Replication

dcrespo wrote:
> Good question. The only concern that I have is the date of the last
> version (2005-3-7).

You will find that their website has not been updated for a while. If
you look in pgfoundry you will find that they have releases as recent as
a few days ago.
The different 1.x versions relate to a different postgres version
(1.7.x is 8.2) (1.5.x is 8.1) (1.3.x is 8.0).
http://pgfoundry.org/projects/pgcluster

> Do you or anybody know if this software (PGCluster) is stable and works
> fine? Please, give information on how it fits your needs.

I haven't used it myself, just been looking around out of curiosity.

> Thank you!
>
> Daniel
>
> km wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 09, 2007 at 12:17:20PM -0600, Scott Marlowe wrote:
>>>> Has anybody researched on this that can point me in the right
>>>> direction?
>>> You could use possibly use pgpool as long as its caveats aren't a show
>>> stopper (can't insert with random, individual inserts with things like
>>> now() might be a little different, insert order might not be the same on
>>> both machines, etc...
>>>
>>> I haven't used daffodil, but have heard of it.
>>>
>>> There's also c-jdbc and a few others.
>> what abt pgcluster ? how does it fare with SlonyI ?
>> regards,
>> KM
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>> TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
>>        choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
>>        match
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?
>
>                http://archives.postgresql.org/
>
>


--

Shane Ambler
pgSQL@007Marketing.com

Get Sheeky @ http://Sheeky.Biz