Re: Config parameters
От | Richard Huxton |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Config parameters |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 459AA952.80008@archonet.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Config parameters ("Jeremy Haile" <jhaile@fastmail.fm>) |
Ответы |
Re: Config parameters
|
Список | pgsql-performance |
Jeremy Haile wrote: > What is a decent default setting for work_mem and maintenance_work_mem, > considering I am regularly querying tables that are tens of millions of > rows and have 2-4 GB of RAM? Well, work_mem will depend on your query-load. Queries that do a lot of sorting should benefit from increased work_mem. You only have limited RAM though, so it's a balancing act between memory used to cache disk and per-process sort memory. Note that work_mem is per sort, so you can use multiples of that amount in a single query. You can issue a "set" to change the value for a session. How you set maintenance_work_mem will depend on whether you vacuum continually (e.g. autovacuum) or at set times. > Also - what is the best way to determine decent settings for > temp_buffers and random_page_cost? With all of these, testing I'm afraid. The only sure thing you can say is that random_page_cost should be 1 if all your database fits in RAM. -- Richard Huxton Archonet Ltd
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: