Re: TODO: GNU TLS

Stephen Frost wrote:

>* David Boreham (david_list@boreham.org) wrote:
>  
>
>>Fascinating thread for the holidays. I found it interesting that nobody 
>>has mentioned
>>NSS (former Netscape SSL library). It has its own bag of problems of 
>>course, but
>>for me is potentially more attractive than GNU TLS. e.g. it has FIPS-140 
>>certification
>>and is actively under development by a software company with significant 
>>resources.
>>It's also very widely deployed. I'm not saying that OpenSSL is bad (it'd 
>>probably be my
>>first choice), just that there is another option besides GNU TLS.
>>    
>>
>
>Not sure what license that's under,
>From http://www.mozilla.org/projects/security/pki/nss/:
'NSS is available under the Mozilla Public License, the GNU General 
Public License, and the GNU Lesser General Public License.'