Re: Problem with large table not using indexes (I think)
От | Benjamin Arai |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Problem with large table not using indexes (I think) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 458D88E6.80609@araisoft.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Problem with large table not using indexes (I think) (Jeff Frost <jeff@frostconsultingllc.com>) |
Список | pgsql-admin |
One more note about my problem, when you run a query on older data in the table then it work great but if you query newer data then is very slow. Ex. SELECT * from my_table WHERE date >=12/1/2005 and date <= 12/1/2006; <- slow SELECT * from my_table WHERE date >=12/1/2002 and date <= 12/1/2003; <- fast It just has to do with the new data for some reason. Benjamin Jeff Frost wrote: > On Sat, 23 Dec 2006, Benjamin Arai wrote: > >> The largest table in my database (30GB) has mysteriously went from >> taking milli-seconds to perform a query to minutes. This disks are >> fine and I have a 4GB shared_memory. Could this slow down have to do >> with the fsm_max_pages or something else like that? I made it larger >> but the queries still taking a long time. I do daily vacuum's but I >> don't run it with -z or --full. I would like to avoid doing a --full >> if possible because it would literally take over a week to complete. >> Any help would be greatly appreciated. > > Benjamin, > > When is the last time you ran ANALYZE? That's what the -z option > does. If you're only vacuuming once daily, you should definitely > analyze with the -z flag as well. >
В списке pgsql-admin по дате отправления: