Re: Problem with large table not using indexes (I think)
От | Benjamin Arai |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Problem with large table not using indexes (I think) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 458D88C8.8010702@benjaminarai.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Problem with large table not using indexes (I think) (Benjamin Arai <benjamin@araisoft.com>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
One more note about my problem, when you run a query on older data in the table then it work great but if you query newer data then is very slow. Ex. SELECT * from my_table WHERE date >=12/1/2005 and date <= 12/1/2006; <- slow SELECT * from my_table WHERE date >=12/1/2002 and date <= 12/1/2003; <- fast It just has to do with the new data for some reason. Benjamin Benjamin Arai wrote: > Function Scan on "getTimeSeries" (cost=0.00..12.50 rows=1000 > width=24) (actual time=11065.981..11067.008 rows=262 loops=1) > Total runtime: 11067.991 ms > (2 rows) > > It is a PL function. Do I need to break it down? > > A. Kretschmer wrote: >> am Sat, dem 23.12.2006, um 11:26:08 -0800 mailte Benjamin Arai >> folgendes: >> >>> because it would literally take over a week to complete. Any help >>> would be greatly appreciated. >>> >> >> What says an 'explain analyse'? >> >> >> Andreas >> > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend >
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: