Re: effective_cache_size vs units
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: effective_cache_size vs units |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4589642B.4050200@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: effective_cache_size vs units (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Eisentraut wrote: > Am Mittwoch, 20. Dezember 2006 13:42 schrieb Tom Dunstan: > >> I suppose we should think about mysql refugees at some point, though. I >> wonder what they do. The documentation is silent on the matter (and all >> their examples are in lower case). Mysql is generally case insensitive, >> right? >> > > Maybe you can make sense of this, but I can't ... > > > [lots of amusing non-orthogonal braindead stuff ...] > > Better not imitate that. > > The MySQL treatment of enums is generally quite reprehensible. The proposed patch by contrast fits quite well into our existing type system, I think. MySQL users migrating will have a bit of work to do. I don't think their experience has much to teach us (except how not to do enums). We should decide on case sensitivity without having reference to it. cheers andrew
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: