Re: column ordering, was Re: [PATCHES] Enums patch v2
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: column ordering, was Re: [PATCHES] Enums patch v2 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 458944A4.8080704@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: column ordering, was Re: [PATCHES] Enums patch v2 (Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: column ordering, was Re: [PATCHES] Enums patch v2
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Martijn van Oosterhout wrote: > On Wed, Dec 20, 2006 at 07:20:14AM -0600, Kenneth Marshall wrote: > >> On Wed, Dec 20, 2006 at 01:26:59PM +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote: >> >>> Am Mittwoch, 20. Dezember 2006 04:44 schrieb Tom Lane: >>> >>>> If you can show me a reasonably bulletproof or machine-checkable way to >>>> keep the two kinds of column numbers distinct, I'd be all for it. >>>> >>> The only way I can see is to make the domains of the numbers distinct. >>> >>> >> Negative vs. positive numbers? >> > > Negative is used by system columns. Just adding some large constant > (say 10000) should be enough. > > Have a nice day, > Or we could divide the positive number space in two, by starting at 2^14 (attnums are int2). Then a simple bitmask test would work to distinguish them. cheers andrew
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: