Re: [PATCHES] Magic block for modules
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [PATCHES] Magic block for modules |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4582.1149027633@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответы |
Re: [PATCHES] Magic block for modules
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org> writes: > On Sun, May 07, 2006 at 08:21:43PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >> I'm pretty sure we had agreed that magic blocks should be required; >> otherwise this check will accomplish little. > Sure, I just didn't want to break every module in one weekend. I was > thinking of adding it with LOG level now, send a message on -announce > saying that at the beginning of the 8.2 freeze it will be an ERROR. > Give people time to react. Now that the magic-block patch is in, we need to revisit this bit of the discussion. I'm for making lack of a magic block an ERROR immediately. I don't see the point of waiting; in fact, if we wait till freeze we'll just make the breakage more concentrated. At the very least it ought to be a WARNING immediately, because a LOG message is just not visible enough. Comments? regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: