Re: pgadmin3-1.6.1 - core dumped - Work around

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Zdenek Kotala
Тема Re: pgadmin3-1.6.1 - core dumped - Work around
Дата
Msg-id 4581A713.7050801@sun.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: pgadmin3-1.6.1 - core dumped - Work around  (Dave Page <dpage@postgresql.org>)
Ответы Re: pgadmin3-1.6.1 - core dumped - Work around  (Dave Page <dpage@postgresql.org>)
Список pgadmin-hackers
Dave Page wrote:
> Zdenek Kotala wrote:
>> Dave Page wrote:
>>> Zdenek,
>>>
>>> Does this occur when you click the Add Server option, or when you hit
>>> OK having filled in the dialog?
>>
>> When you click on add server option.
>
> Yeah I'm now getting that far :-). What I can't get though is any sense
> out of the debugger. Any hints or tips? I'd really like to go back up
> the stack and examine a few variables along the way.
>
> Starting program: /usr/local/src/pgadmin3-1.6.1/src/pgadmin3
> warning: Lowest section in /usr/lib/libpthread.so.1 is .dynamic at 00000074
>
> ** (pgadmin3:6683): CRITICAL **: file blueprint-draw.c: line 81:
> assertion `GTK_WIDGET (widget)' failed
>
> ** (pgadmin3:6683): CRITICAL **: file blueprint-draw.c: line 81:
> assertion `GTK_WIDGET (widget)' failed
>
> (pgadmin3:6683): Gtk-CRITICAL **: file gtkliststore.c: line 570:
> assertion `GTK_LIST_STORE (tree_model)->stamp == iter->stamp' failed
>
> (pgadmin3:6683): GLib-GObject-WARNING **: gtype.c:3350: type id `0' is
> invalid
>
> (pgadmin3:6683): GLib-GObject-WARNING **: can't peek value table for
> type `<invalid>' which is not currently referenced
>
> Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
> 0xd137c3a6 in gtk_tree_model_get_valist () from
> /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
> (gdb) bt
> #0  0xd137c3a6 in gtk_tree_model_get_valist () from
> /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
> #1  0x00000000 in ?? ()
> (gdb)
>

Problem is with cbSSL. This combo box is empty and constructor of
dlgServer try to setup selection on last used value - zero for first
time -, but there is no content of list. Newer version of gtk probably
are able to handle this situation but version used by s10 tries to touch
into empty list.

My question is why this dialog is not filed into the constructor like
cbDatabase?

        Zdenek

В списке pgadmin-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Dhanaraj
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: pgadmin3-1.6.1 - core dumped - Work around
Следующее
От: Dave Page
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: pgadmin3-1.6.1 - core dumped - Work around