Re: New to PostgreSQL, performance considerations
От | Cosimo Streppone |
---|---|
Тема | Re: New to PostgreSQL, performance considerations |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4580264F.8030109@streppone.it обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: New to PostgreSQL, performance considerations (Michael Stone <mstone+postgres@mathom.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: New to PostgreSQL, performance considerations
|
Список | pgsql-performance |
Michael Stone wrote: > On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 01:42:06PM +0100, Cosimo Streppone wrote: >> "-O0" ~ 957 tps >> "-O1 -mcpu=pentium4 -mtune=pentium4" ~ 1186 tps >> "-O2 -mcpu=pentium4 -mtune=pentium4" ~ 1229 tps >> "-O3 -mcpu=pentium4 -mtune=pentium4" ~ 1257 tps >> "-O6 -mcpu=pentium4 -mtune=pentium4" ~ 1254 tps >> >> I'm curious now to get the same tests run with >> a custom-cflags-compiled glibc. > > I'd be curious to see -O2 with and without the arch-specific flags, > since that's mostly what the discussion is about. I run the same tests only for: 1) '-O2' 2) '-O2 -march=pentium4 -mtune=pentium4 -mcpu=pentium4' (so no more doubts here, and thanks for gcc hints :-) and I obtained respectively an average of 1238 (plain -O2) vs. 1229 tps on 9 runs. Disk subsystem is a standard desktop SATA, no more than that. I tried also recompiling *only* pgbench with various options, but as I expected (and hoped) nothing changed. Interesting, eh? -- Cosimo
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: