Re: Load distributed checkpoint
От | Kevin Grittner |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Load distributed checkpoint |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 45795AD1.EE98.0025.0@wicourts.gov обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Load distributed checkpoint (Brad Nicholson <bnichols@ca.afilias.info>) |
Ответы |
Re: Load distributed checkpoint
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
>>> On Fri, Dec 8, 2006 at 12:18 PM, in message <1165601938.10248.56.camel@dba5.int.libertyrms.com>, Brad Nicholson <bnichols@ca.afilias.info> wrote: > > How much increased I/O usage have you seen in regular operation with > those settings? We have not experience any increase in I/O, just a smoothing. Keep in mind that the file system cache will collapse repeated writes to the same location until things settle, and the controller's cache also has a chance of doing so. If we just push dirty pages out to the OS as soon as possible, and let the file system do its job, I think we're in better shape than if we try to micro-manage it within our buffer pages. You mileage may vary of course, but I'm curious whether any real world production examples exist where this approach is a loser. -Kevin
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: