Re: Bad iostat numbers
От | Craig A. James |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Bad iostat numbers |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4575864A.8060005@modgraph-usa.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Bad iostat numbers ("Alex Turner" <armtuk@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Bad iostat numbers
|
Список | pgsql-performance |
Alex Turner wrote: > The problem I see with software raid is the issue of a battery backed > unit: If the computer loses power, then the 'cache' which is held in > system memory, goes away, and fubars your RAID. I'm not sure I see the difference. If data are cached, they're not written whether it is software or hardware RAID. I guessif you're writing RAID 1, the N disks could be out of sync, but the system can synchronize them once the array is restored,so that's no different than a single disk or a hardware RAID. If you're writing RAID 5, then the blocks are inherentlyerror detecting/correcting, so you're still OK if a partial write occurs, right? I'm not familiar with the inner details of software RAID, but the only circumstance I can see where things would get corruptedis if the RAID driver writes a LOT of blocks to one disk of the array before synchronizing the others, but my guess(and it's just a guess) is that the writes to the N disks are tightly coupled. If I'm wrong about this, I'd like to know, because I'm using software RAID 1 and 1+0, and I'm pretty happy with it. Craig
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: