Re: Notify enhancement
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Notify enhancement |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4574337E.9020603@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Notify enhancement (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Notify enhancement
Re: Notify enhancement |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Andrew Dunstan wrote: > > >> Ok. But I think the buffer size as a whole needs to be fixed, no? And if >> so, we probably need some limit on message size to prevent "NOTIFY >> some_event 'a really long string'; " from filling up the buffer in one hit. >> >> I'm also trying to figure out what a reasonable default buffer size will >> be. Thinking of the needs for which I will be providing (one listener, >> small names/payloads), 256Kb or 512Kb would be ample, possibly even >> excessive. But other users might have bigger needs. >> > > Make it configurable via GUC. > That was my intention. The question was what the default should be. > What will happen when the ring is full? NOTIFY blocks? > > An error, I think, don't you? Blocking seems totally unacceptable. cheers andrew
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: