Re: Bad iostat numbers
От | David Boreham |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Bad iostat numbers |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 456F9262.4080207@boreham.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Bad iostat numbers ("Carlos H. Reimer" <carlos.reimer@opendb.com.br>) |
Ответы |
Re: Bad iostat numbers
RES: Bad iostat numbers |
Список | pgsql-performance |
Carlos H. Reimer wrote: > > > avg-cpu: %user %nice %system %iowait %idle > > 50.40 0.00 0.50 1.10 48.00 > > > > Device: rrqm/s wrqm/s r/s w/s rsec/s wsec/s rkB/s wkB/s > avgrq-sz avgqu-sz await svctm %util > > sda 0.00 7.80 0.40 6.40 41.60 113.60 20.80 > 56.80 22.82 570697.50 10.59 147.06 100.00 > > sdb 0.20 7.80 0.60 6.40 40.00 113.60 20.00 > 56.80 21.94 570697.50 9.83 142.86 100.00 > > md1 0.00 0.00 1.20 13.40 81.60 107.20 40.80 > 53.60 12.93 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 > > md0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 > 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 > > > > Are they not saturated? > > > > What kind of parameters should I pay attention when comparing SCSI > controllers and disks? I would like to discover how much cache is > present in the controller, how can I find this value from Linux? > > These number look a bit strange. I am wondering if there is a hardware problem on one of the drives or on the controller. Check in syslog for messages about disk timeouts etc. 100% util but 6 writes/s is just wrong (unless the drive is a 1980's vintage floppy).
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: