Re: [PATCH] Identify LWLocks in tracepoints

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Peter Eisentraut
Тема Re: [PATCH] Identify LWLocks in tracepoints
Дата
Msg-id 4569b684-a0fa-f2c2-205a-70ab8824bd26@enterprisedb.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [PATCH] Identify LWLocks in tracepoints  (Craig Ringer <craig.ringer@enterprisedb.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 05.05.21 06:20, Craig Ringer wrote:
> On Wed, 5 May 2021 at 09:15, Craig Ringer <craig.ringer@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> 
>>> warning: suggest braces around empty body in an ‘if’ statement [-Wempty-body]
>>>   1322 |    TRACE_POSTGRESQL_LWLOCK_WAIT_START(T_NAME(lock), mode);
>>>        |                                                          ^
>>
>> Odd that I didn't get that.
> 
> This compiler complaint is not due to the _ENABLED() test as such.
> It's due to the fact that we completely define out the
> TRACE_POSTGRESQL_ macros with src/backend/utils/Gen_dummy_probes.sed .
> 
> While explicit braces could be added around each test, I suggest
> fixing Gen_dummy_probes.sed to emit the usual dummy statement instead.
> Patch attached.

Committed, with the Gen_dummy_probes.pl change added.



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Joe Conway
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: PG 14 release notes, first draft
Следующее
От: Amit Langote
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Inherited UPDATE/DELETE vs async execution