Re: PostgreSQL Documentation of High Availability and Load Balancing
От | Markus Schiltknecht |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PostgreSQL Documentation of High Availability and Load Balancing |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4561C120.2020705@bluegap.ch обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | PostgreSQL Documentation of High Availability and Load Balancing (Markus Schiltknecht <markus@bluegap.ch>) |
Ответы |
Re: PostgreSQL Documentation of High Availability and Load Balancing
|
Список | pgsql-docs |
Hello Jose, José Orlando Pereira wrote: > Hi, > > Thanks for the heads up. I mostly agree with the text (except maybe the > paragraph on Oracle RAC and 2PC). Hm, what's wrong with that? Okay, we should better not mention Oracle RAC there, but it is a product doing 'Multi-Master Replication Using Clustering', isn't it? > Regarding GORDA, I would not try to fit it into existing bullets, as our > current prototype implements several variations of query broadcasting, > multi-master and master/slave, although none with production quality. AFAIK, we want to help the users to get a general understanding about replication, high availability and load balancing. So as to give them a good starting point on their search for a solution to their problem(s). Thus it's okay if you say GORDA is prototyping several of the algorithms mentioned. I just would like to make sure that the descriptions are general enough to be appropriate for most implementations. For example, recently Josh Berkus proposed, that 'statement-based replication' was the more common term for 'query broadcasting'. Do you agree with that? What did you call it? Does the description fit? > Instead, I'd point out PostgreSQL's friendliness to research and the resulting > prototypes that stem from academia. This can help to draw community attention > to our efforts. Thank you for your suggestions. And I'm glad you're seeing PostgreSQL that way. But I think your additions don't quite fit into the documentation because they are too promotional. I should probably have given some more details about previous discussions. One consensus we've reached was, that we don't want to keep a quickly changing list of open source projects in our documentation. So probably nether GORDA nor Postgres-R will get mentioned there. But for sure we'll compile a list of available replication solutions *somewhere* on the website, where we can change it as often as we want. I'm sure GORDA will get mentioned there. @pgsql-docs: BTW, what's the state on that one? Or do I have to ask that on -www? Regards Markus
В списке pgsql-docs по дате отправления: