Re: max_slot_wal_keep_size and wal_keep_segments
От | David Steele |
---|---|
Тема | Re: max_slot_wal_keep_size and wal_keep_segments |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 455c81a2-faa0-3805-c862-aa5bf45125d9@pgmasters.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: max_slot_wal_keep_size and wal_keep_segments (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: max_slot_wal_keep_size and wal_keep_segments
Re: max_slot_wal_keep_size and wal_keep_segments |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 7/1/20 10:54 AM, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > On 2020-Jul-01, Fujii Masao wrote: > >> On 2020/07/01 12:26, Alvaro Herrera wrote: >>> On 2020-Jun-30, Fujii Masao wrote: >>> >>>> When I talked about max_slot_wal_keep_size as new feature in v13 >>>> at the conference, I received the question like "Why are the units of >>>> setting values in max_slot_wal_keep_size and wal_keep_segments different?" >>>> from audience. That difference looks confusing for users and >>>> IMO it's better to use the same unit for them. Thought? >>> >>> Do we still need wal_keep_segments for anything? >> >> Yeah, personally I like wal_keep_segments because its setting is very >> simple and no extra operations on replication slots are necessary. > > Okay. In that case I +1 the idea of renaming to wal_keep_size. +1 for renaming to wal_keep_size. -- -David david@pgmasters.net
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: