Re: SPF Record ...
От | Dan Langille |
---|---|
Тема | Re: SPF Record ... |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 455F42FB.20168.895738B@dan.langille.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: SPF Record ... ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>) |
Список | pgsql-www |
On 18 Nov 2006 at 13:09, Joshua D. Drake wrote: > > > > O.k. and is OpenSPF the definitive source for information on it? > > > > I do not know who is the definite source. > > > > > Honestly, the whole thing sounds pretty pointless at least at this > > > juncture. I am not bashing the technology but I don't really see a > > > reason for it. > > > > Good! Then you'd agree, there's no harm in publishing our SPF > > records vis DNS and letting others use it. > > My only argument would be *if* there is additional administrative > overhead. If not.. I a really don't care :). If Marc wants to use it, > have at it. It is a DNS record. It only requires updating if you substantially change your existing MX strategy. -- Dan Langille : Software Developer looking for work my resume: http://www.freebsddiary.org/dan_langille.php
В списке pgsql-www по дате отправления: