Re: [CORE] SPF Record ...
От | Dan Langille |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [CORE] SPF Record ... |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 455F298F.29008.83225EA@dan.langille.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [CORE] SPF Record ... ("Dave Page" <dpage@postgresql.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: [CORE] SPF Record ...
Re: [CORE] SPF Record ... Re: [CORE] SPF Record ... |
Список | pgsql-www |
On 18 Nov 2006 at 18:12, Dave Page wrote: > > > > ------- Original Message ------- > > From: "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org> > > To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>, pgsql-www@postgresql.org > > Sent: 18/11/06, 17:38:45 > > Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] [CORE] SPF Record ... > > > > That is not true .. that is only true if we publish -all ... if we publish > > ?all, we are saying that anything coming from "a mx" are *definitely* from > > @postgresql.org, and that from other sources they *might* be ... > > So what's the point then? People either ignore the SPF record, or > refuse mail from the 'might be's'. These are inaccurate conclusions. SPF information helps to draw a conclusion. Consider it a points system. Get so many points for a might be, none for a definitely. Get enough points, you're spam. SPF is most wisely used in conjunction with other information to reach a conclusion. -- Dan Langille : Software Developer looking for work my resume: http://www.freebsddiary.org/dan_langille.php
В списке pgsql-www по дате отправления: