Block B-tree etc. (was Re: Introducing an advanced Frequent Update)
От | Heikki Linnakangas |
---|---|
Тема | Block B-tree etc. (was Re: Introducing an advanced Frequent Update) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 45505719.1070602@enterprisedb.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Introducing an advanced Frequent Update ("Luke Lonergan" <LLonergan@greenplum.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Block B-tree etc. (was Re: Introducing an advanced Frequent Update)
Re: Block B-tree etc. (was Re: Introducing an advanced Frequent |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Luke Lonergan wrote: > Simon, > > Bring it on! We at GP have been evaluating various approaches to index > organized tables which unify index with heap storage to solve some of > the problems you mention. Split index and heap is a big issue in > Postgres and we'd all welcome a good solution to it, even for limited > circumstances like single index organization or the like. I don't think Simon's proposal is meant to address that issue, but did you follow the thread I started in September about Block B-Tree index: http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2006-09/msg02041.php That's our plan to achieve speedups that other DBMS's have achieved with Index-Organized-Tables or Clustered Indexes. We're running initial performance tests of it as we speak, and if all goes well we're hoping to get that into PostgreSQL 8.3. -- Heikki Linnakangas EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: