Re: On what we want to support: travel?
От | Chander Ganesan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: On what we want to support: travel? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 454FB4AA.1020707@otg-nc.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: On what we want to support: travel? ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>) |
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
Hmm...I had the (perhaps mistaken) impression that the value in TPC is not so much in the meetings (which are apparently, highly political ;-) ), but rather in the benchmarks and being able to be favorably compared to other TPC benchmarked databases...no?Does Sun, by any chance, plan on getting into TPC for Sun Supported PostgreSQL? Alternately, perhaps one of the companies that has a PostgreSQL based product would be willing to foot the bill so that the community could have some nifty benchmarks... I would think that they could see the ROI - just by the ability to better classify PostgreSQL among the bigger boys. I would think that a number of corporations withWell as JoshB said, SPI could be a member for about 1500 bucks. I don't think TPC testing is much of the issue. CMD would be willing to sponsor pure PostgreSQL TPC testing if done through SPI.
Chander Ganesan Open Technology Group, Inc. One Copley Parkway, Suite 210 Morrisville, NC 27560 Phone: 877-258-8987/919-463-0999
Sincerely, Joshua D. DrakePostgreSQL based products could benefit (from a sales perspective) from the TPC benchmarks...especially when they come at such a low cost to them. I also think that they could provide some of the manpower required for these benchmarks....
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: