Re: Postgres v MySQL 5.0
От | Lukas Kahwe Smith |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Postgres v MySQL 5.0 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 454376CF.8000702@pooteeweet.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Postgres v MySQL 5.0 ("John Wang" <johncwang@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Postgres v MySQL 5.0
|
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
Hi, Yeah more case studies would be nice, but I guess PostgreSQL will need to be driven from DBA's. Some of the derivatives will be able to use marketing as a tool. But again PostgreSQL is a tool suited best for DBA's. This should be made clear at every opportunity. This makes it clear that PostgreSQL is not lagging behind MySQL in terms of scability or features, just that its tailored to a smaller group of people than the armies of PHP developers that use MySQL. This is not a sign of weakness, just a sign of focus. However, with the growth that PostgreSQL is putting down from the already powerful base I am not all that worried. Like I said early on in this thread, many of the features available in MySQL since the past years simply lack polish. They are often slow and incomplete with the notable exception of their charset support and the imminent release of their partition support. So to make my key point clear once again: Its important to make people understand that PostgreSQL has no intention on competing with MySQL over developers. PostgreSQL is competing for DBA's. regards, Lukas
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: