Re: Is WAL_DEBUG related code still relevant today?
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Is WAL_DEBUG related code still relevant today? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 454368.1701557199@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Is WAL_DEBUG related code still relevant today? (Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Is WAL_DEBUG related code still relevant today?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com> writes: > On Sat, Dec 02, 2023 at 07:36:29PM +0530, Bharath Rupireddy wrote: >> I started to think if this code is needed at all in production. How >> about we do either of the following? > Well, the fact that this code is hidden behind an off-by-default macro > seems like a pretty strong indicator that it is not intended for > production. But that doesn't mean we should remove it. Agreed, production is not the question here. The question is whether it's of any use to developers either. It looks to me that the code's been broken since v13, if not before, which very strongly suggests that nobody is using it. Think I'd vote for nuking it rather than putting effort into fixing it. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: