Re: On what we want to support: travel?
От | Joshua D. Drake |
---|---|
Тема | Re: On what we want to support: travel? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 453E9FFD.20203@commandprompt.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: On what we want to support: travel? (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>) |
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
Josh Berkus wrote: > Andrew, > >> 1. Do we think it is a good idea, in general, to fund >> individuals' travel, assuming such individuals are fairly prominent >> members of the community? > > Yes. Currently, the only people capable of speaking for PostgreSQL who > also have jobs that pay them to do public speaking frequently are me, > Bruce, and Gavin (plus others in Japan). There are more than 100 open > source conferences a year; we can't possibly cover them all with the three > of us.\ I can also speak but it does effect me financially but as many know I don't like to travel much. Anywhere in North America is no sweat. > > Travel sponsorships allow other members of our community to promote and > educate about PostgreSQL in many, many more places. I know that if we'd > had travel money available in 2003, I would have gone to conferences in > Brazil and Indonesia to promote PostgreSQL -- that was a big part of the > reason why Robert Treat and Greg Mullaine started to put together a > non-profit in the first place. Right. > >> 2. If the answer to (1) is "yes", what weight do such cases >> carry compared to other possible expenditures, such as paying coders >> for features; paying for hardware or network service; paying for >> community presence at exhibitions (e.g. getting a "commercial" booth >> at a trade fair); paying for marketing such as advertisements, >> conference "swag", release CDs, and the like; paying for tools for >> individual (or groups of) developers, such as real copies of the SQL >> standard; or even paying for entry to the "industry" groups or >> standards like TPC, ANSI, &c.? The list is not exhaustive; make up >> your own case. > > Personally, I think it's co-equal with the things above categorically, > *except* for paying for a commercial booth at a conference, which I feel > should be our lowest priority if we have cash just lying around. It's the > most expensive item, with the lowest benefit to the community. In general I agree with this. Sincerely, Joshua D. Drake -- === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. === Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240 Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997 http://www.commandprompt.com/ Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: