Re: Syntax bug? Group by?
От | Shane Ambler |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Syntax bug? Group by? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 45350EB4.4020101@007Marketing.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Syntax bug? Group by? (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: Syntax bug? Group by?
Re: Syntax bug? Group by? |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Stephen Frost wrote: > * Mark Woodward (pgsql@mohawksoft.com) wrote: >> If I am asking for a specific column value, should I, technically >> speaking, need to group by that column? > > Technically speaking, if you're asking for a specific tuple, should you > be allowed to request an aggregation? > Only with the assumption that the value in the where clause is for a unique column. If you want min(col2) and avg(col2) where col1=x you can get it without a group by, the same as if you put col1<x - if you want an aggregate of all records returned not the aggregate based on each value of col1. > select ycis_id, min(tindex), avg(tindex) from y where ycis_id = 15; But back to the query the issue comes in that the ycis_id value is included with the return values requested (a single row value with aggregate values that isn't grouped) - if ycis_id is not unique you will get x number of returned tuples with ycis_id=15 and the same min() and avg() values for each row. Removing the ycis_id after the select will return the aggregate values you want without the group by. -- Shane Ambler Postgres@007Marketing.com Get Sheeky @ http://Sheeky.Biz
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: