Re: Function call order dependency
От | pgsql@mohawksoft.com |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Function call order dependency |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 45309.64.119.130.186.1220458259.squirrel@mail.mohawksoft.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Function call order dependency (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Function call order dependency
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> pgsql@mohawksoft.com writes: >> For example I'll use the Oracle "contains" function, though this is not >> exactly what I'm doing, it just illustrates the issue clearly. > >> select *, score(1) from mytable where contains(mytable.title, 'Winding >> Road', 1) order by score(1); > >> The "contains" function does a match against mytable.title for the term >> 'Winding Road' and both returns and saves an integer score which may be >> retrieved later using the "score(...)" function. > > This is just a bad, bad idea. Side-effects in a WHERE-clause function > are guaranteed to cause headaches. When (not if) it breaks, you get > to keep both pieces. I was kind of afraid of that. So, how could one implement such a function set?
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: