Re: PostgreSQL vs. SQL Server, Oracle
От | Joshua D. Drake |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PostgreSQL vs. SQL Server, Oracle |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 452FCEE0.9010604@commandprompt.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: PostgreSQL vs. SQL Server, Oracle ("Jim C. Nasby" <jim@nasby.net>) |
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
> "running PostgreSQL" != "running mission-critical public services on > PostgreSQL". :) > > AFAIK every large customer we've talked to is "running" MySQL... for > internal apps that aren't mission-critical. Well any company will to run mysql for mission critical stuff probably isn't thinking very hard about the implications. Beyond that, I know of several *technical* based fortune 500 companies that are doing exactly that... running postgresql on critical infrastructure. No. I will not name names, don't ask. Sincerely, Joshua D. Drake -- === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. === Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240 Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997 http://www.commandprompt.com/ Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: