Re: PostgreSQL vs. SQL Server, Oracle
От | Joshua D. Drake |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PostgreSQL vs. SQL Server, Oracle |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 452EB7A5.4080403@commandprompt.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: PostgreSQL vs. SQL Server, Oracle (David Fetter <david@fetter.org>) |
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
>> Not only that, but I think the very last answer really hit the nail >> on the head when it comes to MySQL and PostgreSQL: there's no need >> to take MySQL's trade-offs for even your light-weight applications. > > True. > >> The reality is, very few companies are willing to bet their a..erm, >> donkey ;) on PostgreSQL... yet. > > I think this was true two years ago, but just about anybody here can > name a whole bunch of outfits (and probably is not allowed to name > others) that bet the farm on PostgreSQL. :) Shhhhhhhhhhhhh! You will get me in trouble. Joshua D. Drake -- === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. === Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240 Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997 http://www.commandprompt.com/ Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: